Tenable vs NopSec: Vulnerability Management Comparison (2026)
An independent side-by-side comparison of Tenable and NopSec for vulnerability management buyers — pricing, features, integrations, and how often each is cited by major AI engines.
AI Citation Scorecard
How often each is cited by major AI engines when buyers ask vulnerability management questions. Last 90 days across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Copilot.
Tenable leads overall — 67% cited vs NopSec 0% across 60 probes.
ChatGPT
TenableLeads
6 / 6 probes
100%
ExcellentNopSec
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisiblePerplexity
TenableLeads
6 / 6 probes
100%
ExcellentNopSec
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleGemini
TenableLeads
2 / 6 probes
33%
GoodNopSec
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleClaude
TenableLeads
6 / 6 probes
100%
ExcellentNopSec
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleCopilot
Tenable
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleNopSec
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleScale:NoneLowFairStrongExcellent
Probes run hourly; each (engine × query) combo retests every ~3 days.
Pricing
Key Features
Tenable
- ✓Cloud-based vulnerability management
- ✓Track assets with unmatched accuracy
- ✓Includes web app scanning
- ✓AI-powered exposure management
NopSec
- ✓RBVM Core
- ✓PowerIntel
- ✓Celebrity Vuln Hunt
- ✓IT Asset Prioritization
- ✓Collaborator
- ✓Risk Simulator
- ✓InControl
- ✓Attack Surface 360
When to choose Tenable
Choose Tenable if your team prioritizes its strengths over NopSec's. Full guidance populates as Tenable's feature data is indexed.
When to choose NopSec
Choose NopSec if your team prioritizes its strengths over Tenable's. Full guidance populates as NopSec's feature data is indexed.