Tenable vs Holm Security: Vulnerability Management Comparison (2026)
An independent side-by-side comparison of Tenable and Holm Security for vulnerability management buyers — pricing, features, integrations, and how often each is cited by major AI engines.
AI Citation Scorecard
How often each is cited by major AI engines when buyers ask vulnerability management questions. Last 90 days across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Copilot.
Tenable leads overall — 67% cited vs Holm Security 0% across 60 probes.
ChatGPT
TenableLeads
6 / 6 probes
100%
ExcellentHolm Security
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisiblePerplexity
TenableLeads
6 / 6 probes
100%
ExcellentHolm Security
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleGemini
TenableLeads
2 / 6 probes
33%
GoodHolm Security
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleClaude
TenableLeads
6 / 6 probes
100%
ExcellentHolm Security
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleCopilot
Tenable
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleHolm Security
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleScale:NoneLowFairStrongExcellent
Probes run hourly; each (engine × query) combo retests every ~3 days.
Pricing
Key Features
Tenable
- ✓Cloud-based vulnerability management
- ✓Track assets with unmatched accuracy
- ✓Includes web app scanning
- ✓AI-powered exposure management
Holm Security
- ✓Full platform integration
- ✓Risk-based workflows
- ✓Comprehensive vulnerability management
- ✓Automated phishing simulations
- ✓Awareness training modules
- ✓Deployment options (Cloud/On-premise)
- ✓Licensing per asset
- ✓Packages for NIS2 compliance
When to choose Tenable
Choose Tenable if your team prioritizes its strengths over Holm Security's. Full guidance populates as Tenable's feature data is indexed.
When to choose Holm Security
Choose Holm Security if your team prioritizes its strengths over Tenable's. Full guidance populates as Holm Security's feature data is indexed.