Cobalt vs YesWeHack: Pentesting & Offensive Security Comparison (2026)
An independent side-by-side comparison of Cobalt and YesWeHack for pentesting & offensive security buyers — pricing, features, integrations, and how often each is cited by major AI engines.
AI Citation Scorecard
How often each is cited by major AI engines when buyers ask pentesting & offensive security questions. Last 90 days across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Copilot.
Cobalt leads overall — 47% cited vs YesWeHack 17% across 60 probes.
ChatGPT
CobaltLeads
5 / 6 probes
83%
ExcellentYesWeHack
3 / 6 probes
50%
ExcellentPerplexity
CobaltLeads
3 / 6 probes
50%
ExcellentYesWeHack
1 / 6 probes
17%
AverageGemini
CobaltLeads
1 / 6 probes
17%
AverageYesWeHack
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleClaude
CobaltLeads
5 / 6 probes
83%
ExcellentYesWeHack
1 / 6 probes
17%
AverageCopilot
Cobalt
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleYesWeHack
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleScale:NoneLowFairStrongExcellent
Probes run hourly; each (engine × query) combo retests every ~3 days.
Pricing
Key Features
Cobalt
- ✓SAML-Based SSO
- ✓User and Group Access Controls
- ✓Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
- ✓customizable reports
- ✓Insights Dashboard
- ✓Customer success team
- ✓Free retesting
- ✓Credit rollover
YesWeHack
Feature data is being indexed.
When to choose Cobalt
Choose Cobalt if your team prioritizes its strengths over YesWeHack's. Full guidance populates as Cobalt's feature data is indexed.
When to choose YesWeHack
Choose YesWeHack if your team prioritizes its strengths over Cobalt's. Full guidance populates as YesWeHack's feature data is indexed.