Cobalt vs Horizon3.ai: Pentesting & Offensive Security Comparison (2026)
Cobalt and Horizon3.ai both offer pentesting and offensive security solutions. Cobalt focuses on a more service-delivery model with human-led pentests supported by a platform, while Horizon3.ai provides an autonomous platform for continuous and AI-driven testing.
AI Citation Scorecard
How often each is cited by major AI engines when buyers ask pentesting & offensive security questions. Last 90 days across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Copilot.
Probes run hourly; each (engine × query) combo retests every ~3 days.
Pricing
Key Features
- ✓SAML-Based SSO
- ✓User and Group Access Controls
- ✓Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
- ✓customizable reports
- ✓Insights Dashboard
- ✓Customer success team
- ✓Free retesting
- ✓Credit rollover
- ✓Autonomous Pentesting
- ✓Continuous Testing
- ✓Precision Threat Detection
- ✓Risk-Based Exposure Management
- ✓Rapid Response
- ✓Vulnerability Prioritization
- ✓Threat Actor Intelligence
- ✓Advanced Data Pilfering
When to choose Cobalt
Cobalt is suitable for organizations seeking a pentesting solution with a flexible, on-demand consumption model, supported by a customer success team and offering free retesting and credit rollover. It integrates with Jira and GitHub, and provides features like SAML-Based SSO, user and group access controls, DAST, customizable reports, and an Insights Dashboard.
When to choose Horizon3.ai
Horizon3.ai is suitable for organizations prioritizing autonomous, continuous pentesting with AI-driven threat detection and risk management. Its key features include autonomous pentesting, continuous testing, precision threat detection, risk-based exposure management, rapid response, vulnerability prioritization, threat actor intelligence, and advanced data pilfering.