Okta vs CyberArk: Identity & Access Management Comparison (2026)
An independent side-by-side comparison of Okta and CyberArk for identity & access management buyers — pricing, features, integrations, and how often each is cited by major AI engines.
AI Citation Scorecard
How often each is cited by major AI engines when buyers ask identity & access management questions. Last 90 days across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Copilot.
Okta leads overall — 53% cited vs CyberArk 17% across 60 probes.
ChatGPT
OktaLeads
5 / 6 probes
83%
ExcellentCyberArk
1 / 6 probes
17%
AveragePerplexity
OktaLeads
4 / 6 probes
67%
ExcellentCyberArk
3 / 6 probes
50%
ExcellentGemini
OktaLeads
1 / 6 probes
17%
AverageCyberArk
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleClaude
OktaLeads
5 / 6 probes
83%
ExcellentCyberArk
1 / 6 probes
17%
AverageCopilot
OktaLeads
1 / 6 probes
17%
AverageCyberArk
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleScale:NoneLowFairStrongExcellent
Probes run hourly; each (engine × query) combo retests every ~3 days.
Pricing
Key Features
Okta
- ✓Single Sign-On
- ✓Multi-Factor Authentication
- ✓Universal Directory
- ✓Adaptative MFA
- ✓Privileged Access
- ✓Lifecycle Management
- ✓Identity Threat Protection
- ✓Workflows
CyberArk
Feature data is being indexed.
When to choose Okta
Choose Okta if your team prioritizes its strengths over CyberArk's. Full guidance populates as Okta's feature data is indexed.
When to choose CyberArk
Choose CyberArk if your team prioritizes its strengths over Okta's. Full guidance populates as CyberArk's feature data is indexed.