CyberArk vs Ping Identity: Identity & Access Management Comparison (2026)
An independent side-by-side comparison of CyberArk and Ping Identity for identity & access management buyers — pricing, features, integrations, and how often each is cited by major AI engines.
AI Citation Scorecard
How often each is cited by major AI engines when buyers ask identity & access management questions. Last 90 days across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Copilot.
Ping Identity leads overall — 50% cited vs CyberArk 17% across 60 probes.
ChatGPT
CyberArk
1 / 6 probes
17%
AveragePing IdentityLeads
5 / 6 probes
83%
ExcellentPerplexity
CyberArk
3 / 6 probes
50%
ExcellentPing IdentityLeads
4 / 6 probes
67%
ExcellentGemini
CyberArk
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisiblePing Identity
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleClaude
CyberArk
1 / 6 probes
17%
AveragePing IdentityLeads
6 / 6 probes
100%
ExcellentCopilot
CyberArk
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisiblePing Identity
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleScale:NoneLowFairStrongExcellent
Probes run hourly; each (engine × query) combo retests every ~3 days.
Pricing
Key Features
CyberArk
Feature data is being indexed.
Ping Identity
- ✓No-code identity orchestration engine
- ✓Single Sign-on
- ✓Flexible, lightweight directory
- ✓Support for OAuth 2.0 and SAML
- ✓Single click access to all apps
- ✓Ease of Administration
- ✓Inbound Provisioning
- ✓Connect to existing LDAP
When to choose CyberArk
Choose CyberArk if your team prioritizes its strengths over Ping Identity's. Full guidance populates as CyberArk's feature data is indexed.
When to choose Ping Identity
Choose Ping Identity if your team prioritizes its strengths over CyberArk's. Full guidance populates as Ping Identity's feature data is indexed.