CyberArk vs Okta: Identity & Access Management Comparison (2026)
An independent side-by-side comparison of CyberArk and Okta for identity & access management buyers — pricing, features, integrations, and how often each is cited by major AI engines.
AI Citation Scorecard
How often each is cited by major AI engines when buyers ask identity & access management questions. Last 90 days across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Copilot.
Okta leads overall — 53% cited vs CyberArk 17% across 60 probes.
ChatGPT
CyberArk
1 / 6 probes
17%
AverageOktaLeads
5 / 6 probes
83%
ExcellentPerplexity
CyberArk
3 / 6 probes
50%
ExcellentOktaLeads
4 / 6 probes
67%
ExcellentGemini
CyberArk
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleOktaLeads
1 / 6 probes
17%
AverageClaude
CyberArk
1 / 6 probes
17%
AverageOktaLeads
5 / 6 probes
83%
ExcellentCopilot
CyberArk
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleOktaLeads
1 / 6 probes
17%
AverageScale:NoneLowFairStrongExcellent
Probes run hourly; each (engine × query) combo retests every ~3 days.
Pricing
Key Features
CyberArk
Feature data is being indexed.
Okta
- ✓Single Sign-On
- ✓Multi-Factor Authentication
- ✓Universal Directory
- ✓Adaptative MFA
- ✓Privileged Access
- ✓Lifecycle Management
- ✓Identity Threat Protection
- ✓Workflows
When to choose CyberArk
Choose CyberArk if your team prioritizes its strengths over Okta's. Full guidance populates as CyberArk's feature data is indexed.
When to choose Okta
Choose Okta if your team prioritizes its strengths over CyberArk's. Full guidance populates as Okta's feature data is indexed.