ProjectDiscovery vs Intruder: Vulnerability Management Comparison (2026)
An independent side-by-side comparison of ProjectDiscovery and Intruder for vulnerability management buyers — pricing, features, integrations, and how often each is cited by major AI engines.
AI Citation Scorecard
How often each is cited by major AI engines when buyers ask vulnerability management questions. Last 90 days across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Copilot.
Intruder leads overall — 3% cited vs ProjectDiscovery 0% across 60 probes.
ChatGPT
ProjectDiscovery
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleIntruder
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisiblePerplexity
ProjectDiscovery
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleIntruder
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleGemini
ProjectDiscovery
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleIntruderLeads
1 / 6 probes
17%
AverageClaude
ProjectDiscovery
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleIntruder
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleCopilot
ProjectDiscovery
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleIntruder
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleScale:NoneLowFairStrongExcellent
Probes run hourly; each (engine × query) combo retests every ~3 days.
Pricing
Key Features
ProjectDiscovery
- ✓Advanced security testing
- ✓Application and API pentesting
- ✓Red teaming
- ✓Mobile app security
- ✓Vulnerability triage
- ✓Custom automation
- ✓Unlimited seats
- ✓Dedicated human support
Intruder
- ✓Authenticated web app scanning
- ✓Cloud security scans
- ✓Network scans
- ✓Scheduled scans
- ✓Ad hoc scans
- ✓Container image scanning
- ✓Internal vulnerability scanning
- ✓Emerging threat scans
When to choose ProjectDiscovery
Choose ProjectDiscovery if your team prioritizes its strengths over Intruder's. Full guidance populates as ProjectDiscovery's feature data is indexed.
When to choose Intruder
Choose Intruder if your team prioritizes its strengths over ProjectDiscovery's. Full guidance populates as Intruder's feature data is indexed.