Holm Security vs Intruder: Vulnerability Management Comparison (2026)

Holm Security and Intruder both offer vulnerability management solutions, but they differ in their feature sets, deployment options, and licensing models. Holm Security emphasizes comprehensive vulnerability management with risk-based workflows, automated phishing simulations, and awareness training, offering both cloud and on-premise deployment and licensing per asset. Intruder focuses on a wide array of scanning capabilities, including authenticated web app scanning, cloud security, network, container, and internal vulnerability scanning, and provides a free tier. Intruder also offers numerous integrations with popular development and communication tools, which Holm Security does not explicitly list.

AI Citation Scorecard

How often each is cited by major AI engines when buyers ask vulnerability management questions. Last 90 days across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Copilot.

Intruder leads overall3% cited vs Holm Security 0% across 60 probes.
ChatGPT
Holm Security
0 / 6 probes
0%
Invisible
Intruder
0 / 6 probes
0%
Invisible
Perplexity
Holm Security
0 / 6 probes
0%
Invisible
Intruder
0 / 6 probes
0%
Invisible
Gemini
Holm Security
0 / 6 probes
0%
Invisible
IntruderLeads
1 / 6 probes
17%
Average
Claude
Holm Security
0 / 6 probes
0%
Invisible
Intruder
0 / 6 probes
0%
Invisible
Copilot
Holm Security
0 / 6 probes
0%
Invisible
Intruder
0 / 6 probes
0%
Invisible
Scale:NoneLowFairStrongExcellent

Probes run hourly; each (engine × query) combo retests every ~3 days.

Pricing

Holm Security
Starting price
Free tier
holmsecurity.com
Intruder
Starting price
Free tier
Yes
intruder.io

Key Features

Holm Security
  • Full platform integration
  • Risk-based workflows
  • Comprehensive vulnerability management
  • Automated phishing simulations
  • Awareness training modules
  • Deployment options (Cloud/On-premise)
  • Licensing per asset
  • Packages for NIS2 compliance
Intruder
  • Authenticated web app scanning
  • Cloud security scans
  • Network scans
  • Scheduled scans
  • Ad hoc scans
  • Container image scanning
  • Internal vulnerability scanning
  • Emerging threat scans

When to choose Holm Security

Choose Holm Security if your organization requires a comprehensive vulnerability management platform that includes automated phishing simulations and awareness training modules, prefers per-asset licensing, needs on-premise deployment options, or is specifically looking for packages that support NIS2 compliance.

When to choose Intruder

Choose Intruder if your organization prioritizes a variety of scanning options including authenticated web app, cloud, container, and internal scanning, benefits from integrations with tools like Slack, Jira, and GitHub, or is looking for a free tier to start with vulnerability scanning.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the key differences in features between Holm Security and Intruder?
Holm Security offers full platform integration, risk-based workflows, automated phishing simulations, and awareness training modules. Intruder provides authenticated web app scanning, cloud security scans, network scans, scheduled and ad hoc scans, container image scanning, internal vulnerability scanning, and emerging threat scans.
Do Holm Security and Intruder offer free tiers or trials?
Holm Security does not mention a free tier. Intruder offers a free tier and a free trial.
What are the deployment options for Holm Security and Intruder?
Holm Security offers both cloud and on-premise deployment options. Intruder does not specify deployment options beyond its cloud-based scanning capabilities.
How do the licensing models differ between Holm Security and Intruder?
Holm Security licenses per asset. Intruder's licensing details are not fully specified, but it notes that internal target scanning is limited to Pro plans.
What integrations are available for Holm Security and Intruder?
Holm Security does not list specific integrations. Intruder integrates with Slack, Teams, Jira, GitHub, GitLab, ServiceNow, Azure DevOps, and Zapier.

More Vulnerability Management Comparisons