Greenbone vs Holm Security: Vulnerability Management Comparison (2026)
An independent side-by-side comparison of Greenbone and Holm Security for vulnerability management buyers — pricing, features, integrations, and how often each is cited by major AI engines.
AI Citation Scorecard
How often each is cited by major AI engines when buyers ask vulnerability management questions. Last 90 days across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Copilot.
Greenbone leads overall — 20% cited vs Holm Security 0% across 60 probes.
ChatGPT
GreenboneLeads
2 / 6 probes
33%
GoodHolm Security
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisiblePerplexity
GreenboneLeads
3 / 6 probes
50%
ExcellentHolm Security
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleGemini
Greenbone
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleHolm Security
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleClaude
GreenboneLeads
1 / 6 probes
17%
AverageHolm Security
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleCopilot
Greenbone
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleHolm Security
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleScale:NoneLowFairStrongExcellent
Probes run hourly; each (engine × query) combo retests every ~3 days.
Pricing
Key Features
Greenbone
Feature data is being indexed.
Holm Security
- ✓Full platform integration
- ✓Risk-based workflows
- ✓Comprehensive vulnerability management
- ✓Automated phishing simulations
- ✓Awareness training modules
- ✓Deployment options (Cloud/On-premise)
- ✓Licensing per asset
- ✓Packages for NIS2 compliance
When to choose Greenbone
Choose Greenbone if your team prioritizes its strengths over Holm Security's. Full guidance populates as Greenbone's feature data is indexed.
When to choose Holm Security
Choose Holm Security if your team prioritizes its strengths over Greenbone's. Full guidance populates as Holm Security's feature data is indexed.