RingCentral Video vs Microsoft Teams: Video Conferencing Comparison (2026)
An independent side-by-side comparison of RingCentral Video and Microsoft Teams for video conferencing buyers — pricing, features, integrations, and how often each is cited by major AI engines.
AI Citation Scorecard
How often each is cited by major AI engines when buyers ask video conferencing questions. Last 90 days across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Copilot.
RingCentral Video leads overall — 20% cited vs Microsoft Teams 0% across 60 probes.
ChatGPT
RingCentral VideoLeads
3 / 6 probes
50%
ExcellentMicrosoft Teams
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisiblePerplexity
RingCentral Video
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleMicrosoft Teams
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleGemini
RingCentral Video
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleMicrosoft Teams
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleClaude
RingCentral VideoLeads
3 / 6 probes
50%
ExcellentMicrosoft Teams
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleCopilot
RingCentral Video
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleMicrosoft Teams
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleScale:NoneLowFairStrongExcellent
Probes run hourly; each (engine × query) combo retests every ~3 days.
Pricing
Key Features
RingCentral Video
- ✓Unlimited domestic calling
- ✓AI Receptionist add-on
- ✓200 SMS user/month
- ✓HD meetings (200 participants)
- ✓On-demand call recording
- ✓Advanced call monitoring
- ✓Real-time analytics
- ✓Video meetings with 200 participants
Microsoft Teams
- ✓Online meetings and chat
- ✓Real-time collaboration
- ✓Shared cloud storage
When to choose RingCentral Video
Choose RingCentral Video if your team prioritizes its strengths over Microsoft Teams's. Full guidance populates as RingCentral Video's feature data is indexed.
When to choose Microsoft Teams
Choose Microsoft Teams if your team prioritizes its strengths over RingCentral Video's. Full guidance populates as Microsoft Teams's feature data is indexed.