Perimeter 81 vs Cato Networks: SASE / SSE Comparison (2026)
An independent side-by-side comparison of Perimeter 81 and Cato Networks for sase / sse buyers — pricing, features, integrations, and how often each is cited by major AI engines.
AI Citation Scorecard
How often each is cited by major AI engines when buyers ask sase / sse questions. Last 90 days across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Copilot.
Cato Networks leads overall — 40% cited vs Perimeter 81 0% across 60 probes.
ChatGPT
Perimeter 81
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleCato NetworksLeads
5 / 6 probes
83%
ExcellentPerplexity
Perimeter 81
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleCato NetworksLeads
1 / 6 probes
17%
AverageGemini
Perimeter 81
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleCato NetworksLeads
2 / 6 probes
33%
GoodClaude
Perimeter 81
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleCato NetworksLeads
4 / 6 probes
67%
ExcellentCopilot
Perimeter 81
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleCato Networks
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleScale:NoneLowFairStrongExcellent
Probes run hourly; each (engine × query) combo retests every ~3 days.
Pricing
Key Features
Perimeter 81
- ✓Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)
- ✓Secure Web Gateway (SWG)
- ✓Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB)
- ✓10x faster browsing
- ✓Identity-centric zero trust access policy
- ✓Auto-steering based on link health
- ✓Multi-layer security
- ✓AI-based anomaly detection
Cato Networks
- ✓AI Security
- ✓Optimized Networking
- ✓Threat Prevention
- ✓Detection and Response
- ✓Data and App Protection
- ✓Unified Management
When to choose Perimeter 81
Choose Perimeter 81 if your team prioritizes its strengths over Cato Networks's. Full guidance populates as Perimeter 81's feature data is indexed.
When to choose Cato Networks
Choose Cato Networks if your team prioritizes its strengths over Perimeter 81's. Full guidance populates as Cato Networks's feature data is indexed.