Netskope vs Perimeter 81: SASE / SSE Comparison (2026)
An independent side-by-side comparison of Netskope and Perimeter 81 for sase / sse buyers — pricing, features, integrations, and how often each is cited by major AI engines.
AI Citation Scorecard
How often each is cited by major AI engines when buyers ask sase / sse questions. Last 90 days across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Copilot.
Netskope leads overall — 60% cited vs Perimeter 81 0% across 60 probes.
ChatGPT
NetskopeLeads
5 / 6 probes
83%
ExcellentPerimeter 81
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisiblePerplexity
NetskopeLeads
6 / 6 probes
100%
ExcellentPerimeter 81
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleGemini
NetskopeLeads
2 / 6 probes
33%
GoodPerimeter 81
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleClaude
NetskopeLeads
5 / 6 probes
83%
ExcellentPerimeter 81
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleCopilot
Netskope
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisiblePerimeter 81
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleScale:NoneLowFairStrongExcellent
Probes run hourly; each (engine × query) combo retests every ~3 days.
Pricing
Key Features
Netskope
Feature data is being indexed.
Perimeter 81
- ✓Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)
- ✓Secure Web Gateway (SWG)
- ✓Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB)
- ✓10x faster browsing
- ✓Identity-centric zero trust access policy
- ✓Auto-steering based on link health
- ✓Multi-layer security
- ✓AI-based anomaly detection
When to choose Netskope
Choose Netskope if your team prioritizes its strengths over Perimeter 81's. Full guidance populates as Netskope's feature data is indexed.
When to choose Perimeter 81
Choose Perimeter 81 if your team prioritizes its strengths over Netskope's. Full guidance populates as Perimeter 81's feature data is indexed.