iboss vs Perimeter 81: SASE / SSE Comparison (2026)
iboss and Perimeter 81 both offer SASE/SSE platforms with Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) and Secure Web Gateway (SWG) capabilities. iboss highlights AI-powered CASB & DLP, while Perimeter 81 emphasizes identity-centric zero trust access policy and AI-based anomaly detection.
AI Citation Scorecard
How often each is cited by major AI engines when buyers ask sase / sse questions. Last 90 days across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Copilot.
Probes run hourly; each (engine × query) combo retests every ~3 days.
Pricing
Key Features
- ✓Advanced Ransomware & Malware Protection
- ✓AI-Powered CASB & DLP
- ✓Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)
- ✓Comprehensive Secure Web Gateway
- ✓Real-Time Threat Intelligence
- ✓Custom Web Filtering Policies
- ✓File Type Blocking & Download Protection
- ✓Device Posture Checks & Compliance
- ✓Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)
- ✓Secure Web Gateway (SWG)
- ✓Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB)
- ✓10x faster browsing
- ✓Identity-centric zero trust access policy
- ✓Auto-steering based on link health
- ✓Multi-layer security
- ✓AI-based anomaly detection
When to choose iboss
iboss is suitable when a comprehensive SASE solution with advanced threat detection, including advanced ransomware and malware protection, AI-powered CASB and DLP, real-time threat intelligence, custom web filtering policies, file type blocking, download protection, device posture checks, and compliance features, is required. It also provides integrations with Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps, Splunk, Google SecOps, SentinelOne, and CrowdStrike.
When to choose Perimeter 81
Perimeter 81 is suitable when a platform with ZTNA, SWG, CASB, 10x faster browsing, identity-centric zero trust access policy, auto-steering based on link health, multi-layer security, and AI-based anomaly detection is needed. It focuses on fast deployment and ease of use.