Cisco Umbrella vs Perimeter 81: SASE / SSE Comparison (2026)
Cisco Umbrella and Perimeter 81 both offer SASE/SSE platforms, but they differentiate in their core focus and specific features. Cisco Umbrella highlights its industry-leading DNS security and comprehensive threat protection, while Perimeter 81 emphasizes Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) and a broader range of security features like SWG and CASB.
AI Citation Scorecard
How often each is cited by major AI engines when buyers ask sase / sse questions. Last 90 days across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Copilot.
Probes run hourly; each (engine × query) combo retests every ~3 days.
Pricing
Key Features
- ✓Industry-leading DNS security
- ✓Robust DNS security + more
- ✓Secure Internet Access (SIA)
- ✓Security Service Edge (SSE)
- ✓Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)
- ✓Secure Web Gateway (SWG)
- ✓Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB)
- ✓10x faster browsing
- ✓Identity-centric zero trust access policy
- ✓Auto-steering based on link health
- ✓Multi-layer security
- ✓AI-based anomaly detection
When to choose Cisco Umbrella
Cisco Umbrella is more suitable for organizations prioritizing robust DNS security and a straightforward, easy-to-manage platform for threat protection. Its focus on DNS security and secure internet access makes it a strong contender for foundational security needs and a zero-trust approach.
When to choose Perimeter 81
Perimeter 81 is a strong option for organizations looking for a comprehensive SASE solution with a strong emphasis on Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA). Its inclusion of Secure Web Gateway (SWG), Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB), and AI-based anomaly detection, along with features like 10x faster browsing and auto-steering based on link health, cater to those seeking an all-in-one platform with advanced security and performance capabilities for remote access scenarios.