XM Cyber vs Horizon3.ai: Pentesting & Offensive Security Comparison (2026)
An independent side-by-side comparison of XM Cyber and Horizon3.ai for pentesting & offensive security buyers — pricing, features, integrations, and how often each is cited by major AI engines.
AI Citation Scorecard
How often each is cited by major AI engines when buyers ask pentesting & offensive security questions. Last 90 days across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Copilot.
Tied overall — both at 3% cited across 60 probes.
ChatGPT
XM CyberLeads
1 / 6 probes
17%
AverageHorizon3.ai
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisiblePerplexity
XM Cyber
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleHorizon3.ai
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleGemini
XM Cyber
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleHorizon3.aiLeads
1 / 6 probes
17%
AverageClaude
XM Cyber
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleHorizon3.ai
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleCopilot
XM Cyber
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleHorizon3.ai
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleScale:NoneLowFairStrongExcellent
Probes run hourly; each (engine × query) combo retests every ~3 days.
Pricing
Key Features
XM Cyber
Feature data is being indexed.
Horizon3.ai
- ✓Autonomous Pentesting
- ✓Continuous Testing
- ✓Precision Threat Detection
- ✓Risk-Based Exposure Management
- ✓Rapid Response
- ✓Vulnerability Prioritization
- ✓Threat Actor Intelligence
- ✓Advanced Data Pilfering
When to choose XM Cyber
Choose XM Cyber if your team prioritizes its strengths over Horizon3.ai's. Full guidance populates as XM Cyber's feature data is indexed.
When to choose Horizon3.ai
Choose Horizon3.ai if your team prioritizes its strengths over XM Cyber's. Full guidance populates as Horizon3.ai's feature data is indexed.