Intigriti vs Cobalt: Pentesting & Offensive Security Comparison (2026)
An independent side-by-side comparison of Intigriti and Cobalt for pentesting & offensive security buyers — pricing, features, integrations, and how often each is cited by major AI engines.
AI Citation Scorecard
How often each is cited by major AI engines when buyers ask pentesting & offensive security questions. Last 90 days across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Copilot.
Cobalt leads overall — 47% cited vs Intigriti 20% across 60 probes.
ChatGPT
Intigriti
2 / 6 probes
33%
GoodCobaltLeads
5 / 6 probes
83%
ExcellentPerplexity
Intigriti
1 / 6 probes
17%
AverageCobaltLeads
3 / 6 probes
50%
ExcellentGemini
Intigriti
1 / 6 probes
17%
AverageCobalt
1 / 6 probes
17%
AverageClaude
Intigriti
2 / 6 probes
33%
GoodCobaltLeads
5 / 6 probes
83%
ExcellentCopilot
Intigriti
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleCobalt
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleScale:NoneLowFairStrongExcellent
Probes run hourly; each (engine × query) combo retests every ~3 days.
Pricing
Key Features
Intigriti
- ✓Private & public bug bounty
- ✓Vulnerability Disclosure Program (VDP)
- ✓Community management
- ✓Attack surface mapping
- ✓Native Slack & Jira integration
- ✓Custom reporting
- ✓Researcher proxy
- ✓Live hacking event option
Cobalt
- ✓SAML-Based SSO
- ✓User and Group Access Controls
- ✓Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
- ✓customizable reports
- ✓Insights Dashboard
- ✓Customer success team
- ✓Free retesting
- ✓Credit rollover
When to choose Intigriti
Choose Intigriti if your team prioritizes its strengths over Cobalt's. Full guidance populates as Intigriti's feature data is indexed.
When to choose Cobalt
Choose Cobalt if your team prioritizes its strengths over Intigriti's. Full guidance populates as Cobalt's feature data is indexed.