Horizon3.ai vs XM Cyber: Pentesting & Offensive Security Comparison (2026)

An independent side-by-side comparison of Horizon3.ai and XM Cyber for pentesting & offensive security buyers — pricing, features, integrations, and how often each is cited by major AI engines.

AI Citation Scorecard

How often each is cited by major AI engines when buyers ask pentesting & offensive security questions. Last 90 days across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Copilot.

Tied overall — both at 3% cited across 60 probes.
ChatGPT
Horizon3.ai
0 / 6 probes
0%
Invisible
XM CyberLeads
1 / 6 probes
17%
Average
Perplexity
Horizon3.ai
0 / 6 probes
0%
Invisible
XM Cyber
0 / 6 probes
0%
Invisible
Gemini
Horizon3.aiLeads
1 / 6 probes
17%
Average
XM Cyber
0 / 6 probes
0%
Invisible
Claude
Horizon3.ai
0 / 6 probes
0%
Invisible
XM Cyber
0 / 6 probes
0%
Invisible
Copilot
Horizon3.ai
0 / 6 probes
0%
Invisible
XM Cyber
0 / 6 probes
0%
Invisible
Scale:NoneLowFairStrongExcellent

Probes run hourly; each (engine × query) combo retests every ~3 days.

Pricing

Horizon3.ai
Starting price
Free tier
horizon3.ai
XM Cyber
Starting price
Free tier
xmcyber.com

Key Features

Horizon3.ai
  • Autonomous Pentesting
  • Continuous Testing
  • Precision Threat Detection
  • Risk-Based Exposure Management
  • Rapid Response
  • Vulnerability Prioritization
  • Threat Actor Intelligence
  • Advanced Data Pilfering
XM Cyber

Feature data is being indexed.

When to choose Horizon3.ai

Choose Horizon3.ai if your team prioritizes its strengths over XM Cyber's. Full guidance populates as Horizon3.ai's feature data is indexed.

When to choose XM Cyber

Choose XM Cyber if your team prioritizes its strengths over Horizon3.ai's. Full guidance populates as XM Cyber's feature data is indexed.

More Pentesting & Offensive Security Comparisons