AttackIQ vs Cobalt: Pentesting & Offensive Security Comparison (2026)
An independent side-by-side comparison of AttackIQ and Cobalt for pentesting & offensive security buyers — pricing, features, integrations, and how often each is cited by major AI engines.
AI Citation Scorecard
How often each is cited by major AI engines when buyers ask pentesting & offensive security questions. Last 90 days across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Copilot.
Cobalt leads overall — 47% cited vs AttackIQ 7% across 60 probes.
ChatGPT
AttackIQ
1 / 6 probes
17%
AverageCobaltLeads
5 / 6 probes
83%
ExcellentPerplexity
AttackIQ
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleCobaltLeads
3 / 6 probes
50%
ExcellentGemini
AttackIQ
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleCobaltLeads
1 / 6 probes
17%
AverageClaude
AttackIQ
1 / 6 probes
17%
AverageCobaltLeads
5 / 6 probes
83%
ExcellentCopilot
AttackIQ
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleCobalt
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleScale:NoneLowFairStrongExcellent
Probes run hourly; each (engine × query) combo retests every ~3 days.
Pricing
Key Features
AttackIQ
Feature data is being indexed.
Cobalt
- ✓SAML-Based SSO
- ✓User and Group Access Controls
- ✓Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
- ✓customizable reports
- ✓Insights Dashboard
- ✓Customer success team
- ✓Free retesting
- ✓Credit rollover
When to choose AttackIQ
Choose AttackIQ if your team prioritizes its strengths over Cobalt's. Full guidance populates as AttackIQ's feature data is indexed.
When to choose Cobalt
Choose Cobalt if your team prioritizes its strengths over AttackIQ's. Full guidance populates as Cobalt's feature data is indexed.