Ping Identity vs CyberArk: Identity & Access Management Comparison (2026)
An independent side-by-side comparison of Ping Identity and CyberArk for identity & access management buyers — pricing, features, integrations, and how often each is cited by major AI engines.
AI Citation Scorecard
How often each is cited by major AI engines when buyers ask identity & access management questions. Last 90 days across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Copilot.
Ping Identity leads overall — 50% cited vs CyberArk 17% across 60 probes.
ChatGPT
Ping IdentityLeads
5 / 6 probes
83%
ExcellentCyberArk
1 / 6 probes
17%
AveragePerplexity
Ping IdentityLeads
4 / 6 probes
67%
ExcellentCyberArk
3 / 6 probes
50%
ExcellentGemini
Ping Identity
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleCyberArk
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleClaude
Ping IdentityLeads
6 / 6 probes
100%
ExcellentCyberArk
1 / 6 probes
17%
AverageCopilot
Ping Identity
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleCyberArk
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleScale:NoneLowFairStrongExcellent
Probes run hourly; each (engine × query) combo retests every ~3 days.
Pricing
Key Features
Ping Identity
- ✓No-code identity orchestration engine
- ✓Single Sign-on
- ✓Flexible, lightweight directory
- ✓Support for OAuth 2.0 and SAML
- ✓Single click access to all apps
- ✓Ease of Administration
- ✓Inbound Provisioning
- ✓Connect to existing LDAP
CyberArk
Feature data is being indexed.
When to choose Ping Identity
Choose Ping Identity if your team prioritizes its strengths over CyberArk's. Full guidance populates as Ping Identity's feature data is indexed.
When to choose CyberArk
Choose CyberArk if your team prioritizes its strengths over Ping Identity's. Full guidance populates as CyberArk's feature data is indexed.