IRONSCALES vs GreatHorn: Email Security Comparison (2026)
An independent side-by-side comparison of IRONSCALES and GreatHorn for email security buyers — pricing, features, integrations, and how often each is cited by major AI engines.
AI Citation Scorecard
How often each is cited by major AI engines when buyers ask email security questions. Last 90 days across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Copilot.
IRONSCALES leads overall — 23% cited vs GreatHorn 0% across 60 probes.
ChatGPT
IRONSCALESLeads
2 / 6 probes
33%
GoodGreatHorn
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisiblePerplexity
IRONSCALES
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleGreatHorn
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleGemini
IRONSCALESLeads
4 / 6 probes
67%
ExcellentGreatHorn
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleClaude
IRONSCALESLeads
1 / 6 probes
17%
AverageGreatHorn
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleCopilot
IRONSCALES
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleGreatHorn
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleScale:NoneLowFairStrongExcellent
Probes run hourly; each (engine × query) combo retests every ~3 days.
Pricing
Key Features
IRONSCALES
- ✓AI-Powered Phishing Detection
- ✓Adaptive AI Autonomous Remediation
- ✓Comprehensive Email Security
- ✓Unlimited Phishing Simulation Testing
GreatHorn
Feature data is being indexed.
When to choose IRONSCALES
Choose IRONSCALES if your team prioritizes its strengths over GreatHorn's. Full guidance populates as IRONSCALES's feature data is indexed.
When to choose GreatHorn
Choose GreatHorn if your team prioritizes its strengths over IRONSCALES's. Full guidance populates as GreatHorn's feature data is indexed.