Cofense vs Agari: Email Security Comparison (2026)
An independent side-by-side comparison of Cofense and Agari for email security buyers — pricing, features, integrations, and how often each is cited by major AI engines.
AI Citation Scorecard
How often each is cited by major AI engines when buyers ask email security questions. Last 90 days across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Copilot.
Cofense leads overall — 17% cited vs Agari 3% across 60 probes.
ChatGPT
CofenseLeads
1 / 6 probes
17%
AverageAgari
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisiblePerplexity
CofenseLeads
3 / 6 probes
50%
ExcellentAgari
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleGemini
Cofense
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleAgari
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleClaude
Cofense
1 / 6 probes
17%
AverageAgari
1 / 6 probes
17%
AverageCopilot
Cofense
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleAgari
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleScale:NoneLowFairStrongExcellent
Probes run hourly; each (engine × query) combo retests every ~3 days.
Pricing
Key Features
Cofense
- ✓AI-driven campaign detection
- ✓Human-validated threat intelligence
- ✓Automatic quarantine of threats
- ✓Improves SOC efficiency
Agari
- ✓AI and threat intelligence integration
- ✓Automated email threat response
- ✓DMARC policy management
- ✓Spam and phishing protection
- ✓Real-time email archiving
- ✓Email encryption options
- ✓Adaptive security measures
- ✓Advanced threat inspection
When to choose Cofense
Choose Cofense if your team prioritizes its strengths over Agari's. Full guidance populates as Cofense's feature data is indexed.
When to choose Agari
Choose Agari if your team prioritizes its strengths over Cofense's. Full guidance populates as Agari's feature data is indexed.