Abnormal Security vs Tessian: Email Security Comparison (2026)
An independent side-by-side comparison of Abnormal Security and Tessian for email security buyers — pricing, features, integrations, and how often each is cited by major AI engines.
AI Citation Scorecard
How often each is cited by major AI engines when buyers ask email security questions. Last 90 days across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Copilot.
Abnormal Security leads overall — 27% cited vs Tessian 10% across 60 probes.
ChatGPT
Abnormal SecurityLeads
1 / 6 probes
17%
AverageTessian
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisiblePerplexity
Abnormal SecurityLeads
3 / 6 probes
50%
ExcellentTessian
1 / 6 probes
17%
AverageGemini
Abnormal Security
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleTessian
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleClaude
Abnormal SecurityLeads
4 / 6 probes
67%
ExcellentTessian
2 / 6 probes
33%
GoodCopilot
Abnormal Security
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleTessian
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleScale:NoneLowFairStrongExcellent
Probes run hourly; each (engine × query) combo retests every ~3 days.
Pricing
Key Features
Abnormal Security
Feature data is being indexed.
Tessian
- ✓AI-powered email threat detection
- ✓Prevent data loss over email
- ✓Integrated email security solutions
- ✓Streamline security analyst workflows
When to choose Abnormal Security
Choose Abnormal Security if your team prioritizes its strengths over Tessian's. Full guidance populates as Abnormal Security's feature data is indexed.
When to choose Tessian
Choose Tessian if your team prioritizes its strengths over Abnormal Security's. Full guidance populates as Tessian's feature data is indexed.