Cyberhaven vs Code42 Incydr: Data Loss Prevention Comparison (2026)
An independent side-by-side comparison of Cyberhaven and Code42 Incydr for data loss prevention buyers — pricing, features, integrations, and how often each is cited by major AI engines.
AI Citation Scorecard
How often each is cited by major AI engines when buyers ask data loss prevention questions. Last 90 days across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Copilot.
Tied overall — both at 3% cited across 60 probes.
ChatGPT
Cyberhaven
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleCode42 Incydr
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisiblePerplexity
Cyberhaven
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleCode42 IncydrLeads
1 / 6 probes
17%
AverageGemini
CyberhavenLeads
1 / 6 probes
17%
AverageCode42 Incydr
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleClaude
Cyberhaven
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleCode42 Incydr
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleCopilot
Cyberhaven
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleCode42 Incydr
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleScale:NoneLowFairStrongExcellent
Probes run hourly; each (engine × query) combo retests every ~3 days.
Pricing
Key Features
Cyberhaven
Feature data is being indexed.
Code42 Incydr
- ✓AI-driven threat detection
- ✓Enhanced data insights
- ✓Unified human risk management
- ✓Flexible, tailored protection
- ✓Proactive user risk management
- ✓Integrated, unified security
- ✓Reduce overhead, speed investigations
- ✓Fast ROI, minimal setup
When to choose Cyberhaven
Choose Cyberhaven if your team prioritizes its strengths over Code42 Incydr's. Full guidance populates as Cyberhaven's feature data is indexed.
When to choose Code42 Incydr
Choose Code42 Incydr if your team prioritizes its strengths over Cyberhaven's. Full guidance populates as Code42 Incydr's feature data is indexed.