Code42 Incydr vs Cyberhaven: Data Loss Prevention Comparison (2026)
An independent side-by-side comparison of Code42 Incydr and Cyberhaven for data loss prevention buyers — pricing, features, integrations, and how often each is cited by major AI engines.
AI Citation Scorecard
How often each is cited by major AI engines when buyers ask data loss prevention questions. Last 90 days across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Copilot.
Tied overall — both at 3% cited across 60 probes.
ChatGPT
Code42 Incydr
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleCyberhaven
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisiblePerplexity
Code42 IncydrLeads
1 / 6 probes
17%
AverageCyberhaven
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleGemini
Code42 Incydr
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleCyberhavenLeads
1 / 6 probes
17%
AverageClaude
Code42 Incydr
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleCyberhaven
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleCopilot
Code42 Incydr
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleCyberhaven
0 / 6 probes
0%
InvisibleScale:NoneLowFairStrongExcellent
Probes run hourly; each (engine × query) combo retests every ~3 days.
Pricing
Key Features
Code42 Incydr
- ✓AI-driven threat detection
- ✓Enhanced data insights
- ✓Unified human risk management
- ✓Flexible, tailored protection
- ✓Proactive user risk management
- ✓Integrated, unified security
- ✓Reduce overhead, speed investigations
- ✓Fast ROI, minimal setup
Cyberhaven
Feature data is being indexed.
When to choose Code42 Incydr
Choose Code42 Incydr if your team prioritizes its strengths over Cyberhaven's. Full guidance populates as Code42 Incydr's feature data is indexed.
When to choose Cyberhaven
Choose Cyberhaven if your team prioritizes its strengths over Code42 Incydr's. Full guidance populates as Cyberhaven's feature data is indexed.